Autodesk inventor vs inventor professional 2018 free.What’s New in Autodesk Inventor 2018
Hi, I am currently using Inventor Pro and it is great software for mechanical engineering design. But some of my friends recommends Solidworks is good for 3d design. So I posted this question. Go to Solution. All software has its pros and cons.. You have to decided which application fits your needs.
Weight the pros and cons. Just because your friends say this package is better doesn’t mean it better for you. Mark Lancaster. Did this resolve your issue? Please accept it “As a Solution” so others may benefit from it. Much has been discussed on this topic in the past, please spend some time reading those discussions first, and then return to ask more specific questions if needed. See link:. In general “which is better product X or product Y?
Again you can find those topics at the link I posted above. I hope this helps. I do have to point out that you posted this question to a group of individuals on an Autodesk forum, most of whom make their living using Inventor. That said, I think you should maybe give us a little more information about what you want to use this for, as some software is better at one thing than others So, knowing what you will use it for may help us to advise you better.
Thanks for reply. I want to use inventor for motor car engine design and manufacturing, heat and thermal effects analysis. This is an interesting question but I am not sure how you would be able to find the answer anywhere. My question is how you define “best. If one of them was not up to the task, it should have been gone by now. You might be able to find an answer of which is better of the two in terms of a specific workflow or a specific design. There is nothing wrong using SWX.
Nor is nothing wrong using Inventor. Nowadays, these major players support associative interoperable workflows.
One can read the other’s file somewhat associatively. It is a multi-CAD world. We have customers using multiple tools. At the end of the day, it is about how to get the job done reliably and quickly. I work for Inventor team. You know my answer. They each have their own followers However, why not ask.. They will prefer to take on someone who is trained in these tools and has an official training Certificate to prove it.
A lot of companies you listed here use different CAD systems for different purposes at different divisions.
I don’t think they use singular solution. Some also use Inventor. Take the ultra high performance race car maker Koenigsegg Engieering for example. They also use Inventor along with other CAD systems. Please see the public link below. With both you can go from A to B Do not listen who tell you that all cad are the same, like here.
I suppose they never used and tested for at least 2 years I might have to do with time spent in the package, but even now I feel you need much more clicks to do the same. After some time these little annoyances might disappear. It is also difficult to find the package that belong to your needs, when you don’t know the package is able to do.
I have attended most the Solidworks courses. And passed the Associate, and Sheet Metal Professional exams. So i used Solidworks a lot. And in my opioin Inventor is a lot better. But like people have said, it depends what you want it for. For me i wanted Sheet Metal and iLogic. Solidworks can’t change models as good as Inventor. I can change my models in seconds. And on the courses i went on no one could get my model to change that quick in Solidworks.
They could not even get it to change how i wanted it to. I also found the people teaching in the training courses wasn’t as knowledgeable as they were on the Inventor courses. And i went to 3 different training centers, and it was the same at all of them.
This is partly due to they was straight out of university, so hadn’t used the software in a real design environment. So did not understand a lot of questions i asked them. Whereas the people training the Inventor courses had all worked in a design area for a number of years.
So understood more. Does SolidWorks? The correct answer is – No. If that is not normal – which CAD programs do? I have used both daily for years and am a certified professional in both.
Would you recommend that the OP listen to my opinions which I can back up with examples in both softwares? If I may, if you are needing 3x the steps and operations in Inventor vs SWX, I’d say you’re not doing it correctly and may need professional training. Typical Adesk software, if you know one way to do it, there’s at least another 4 other ways.
Not sure what you mean by “often without a specific command or way”. Can you explain? Better yet, have you posted the issues on the main board? Your comment of “Inventor isn’t multicore in 3d modeling ” is false, sorry. Inventor does in fact access and use multi-core, but only for commands that require it.
Think a basic linear Extrude, versus Stress analysis. In general terms SWX and Inventor are the same, but they each have their differences. Were you professionally trained on SWX? If so, I’ll bet you compared the two back then as well. I’ve worked with both, often at the same time. Our parts were being held or had to be held to the 4th decimal and this type of failure rate was and would have killed us.
That was SWX’s release. Haven’t used it since. The other main issue he had was while in Inventor we were able to easily use equations in parameters and elsewhere, SWX until very recently didn’t offer such. We used it extensively. Again, it all comes down to how you use the software. The best advice I can give is get a trial version 30 days typically isn’t enough, but that’s all you’ll get and run the softwares thru your typical daily routines.
But, and this is a biggie, understand that you simply don’t know the more advanced abilities of these softwares and therefore will be stuck dealing with the basics. It’s extremely hard to not compare the basics of a software you aren’t well versed with to the more advanced commands you typically use on a software you are well versed with. Quick example of that, a few years back I started teaching an Inventor Intro class, the first few classes I struggled and the students actually questioned if I knew the software or not.
At that point I showed them the more advanced commands I’d use to do what the lesson was covering, jaws dropped. The issue was I hadn’t used those basic commands in many years, I had moved on to the move advanced and more efficient way of creating the same features.
I literally had to relearn the software basics. O’Flaherty, never go into small computers. There’s no future in them” – Dr. Choi circa You might have over-valued your contribution to the discussion.
Compare Inventor vs. Inventor LT | Autodesk
Lectures and practices use the standard software templates and default options for the Content Libraries. Students and Educators can Access Free Autodesk. CAD Studio file download – utilities, patches, goodies, add-ons, freeware. Get files for your AutoCAD, Inventor, Revit, Civil 3D, Fusion and 3ds Max. autodesk inventor professional
Solved: Inventor Professional – Autodesk Community.AutoCAD vs Inventor | Find Out The 6 Amazing Differences
Autodesk Inventor LT Is The Easy-to-follow Hands-on Training You’ve Been Looking For. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Paul Munford Is An Application Engineer For Graitec Professional Services. Until Recently Paul Was The CAD/CAM Manager For A Cabinet Maker In The United Kingdom. Jan 2th, Autodesk Inventor Tube And Pipe Design Autodesk. Jul 09, · There’s no such thing as Inventor (standard) You only get Inventor Pro now. However if you have Inventor Standard on an active maintenance or subscription plan than you have access to that version. The single installation does contain both versions to support those users who still have access to Inventor Standard. Mark LancasterEstimated Reading Time: 1 min. Inventor is built for the continually evolving needs of the modern design and engineering professional. Building on its breadth of modeling capabilities and powerful design automation tools, Inventor marks the next step forward in professional-grade 3D mechanical engineering design. Interoperability enhancements enable distributed, multi disciplinary teams .